奥伯龙等 vs. Rust
2 分•作者: mikethe•6 个月前
您好，
我最近看到了几年前的这个帖子：https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34501352
我特别感兴趣的是 vidarh 的评论，开头是：“你已经得到了答案：简单性。你一直在忽略它。”
我非常想知道这个人对 Rust 的看法。例如，它比 Oberon 或其后代更好吗？
我听说 Rust 是一种大型语言。按照这个定义，更简单的语言一定更好，对吧？然而 Rust 却很庞大，而 Oberon 却…… 已经过时了？
我会继续搜索，也许会尝试直接联系他/她/他们。
查看原文
Greetings,<p>I recently came accross this thread from a few years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34501352<p>I am interested, in particular, by the comment by vidarh, that starts with:<p>"You've been given the answer already: Simplicity. You keep ignoring it."<p>I find myself highly interested in what this person would have to say about rust. Is it better than, for example, oberon, or it's descendents?<p>I have heard that Rust is a big language. By that definition, a simpler one must be better, right? And yet rust is a big thing, and .. oberon is ..dusty?<p>I will keep on searching, and maybe attempt to contact him/her/(other?) directly.