问 HN：应该在 HN 指导原则中禁止“我问了 $AI，它说”这样的回复吗？
145 分•作者: embedding-shape•7 个月前
随着各种大型语言模型（LLM）越来越受欢迎，诸如“我问了Gemini，Gemini说……”之类的评论也越来越多。<p>虽然Hacker News（HN）的指导方针是在不同的时期编写（并不断迭代）的，但似乎是时候讨论一下是否应该欢迎这类评论了。<p>一些例子：<p>- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46164360<p>- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46200460<p>- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46080064<p>就我个人而言，我上HN是为了参与人类的对话，而大型LLM生成的文本只会妨碍我阅读真实人类（至少是假设的）的真实文本。<p>你觉得呢？ 那些基本上归结为“我问了$LLM关于$X的问题，以下是$LLM的回答：”的回复应该被允许在HN上吗？是否应该更新指导方针，声明人们不应该对其进行批判（类似于目前的其他指导方针），或者应该添加新的指导方针，要求人们不要将大型LLM的回复复制粘贴到评论中，还是应该采取其他完全不同的措施？
查看原文
As various LLMs become more and more popular, so does comments with "I asked Gemini, and Gemini said ....".<p>While the guidelines were written (and iterated on) during a different time, it seems like it might be time to have a discussion about if those sort of comments should be welcomed on HN or not.<p>Some examples:<p>- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46164360<p>- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46200460<p>- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46080064<p>Personally, I'm on HN for the human conversation, and large LLM-generated texts just get in the way of reading real text from real humans (assumed, at least).<p>What do you think? Should responses that basically boil down to "I asked $LLM about $X, and here is what $LLM said:" be allowed on HN, and the guidelines updated to state that people shouldn't critique it (similar to other guidelines currently), or should a new guideline be added to ask people from refrain from copy-pasting large LLM responses into the comments, or something else completely?