问 HN：流媒体应用为何如此糟糕（仅限业内人士）？
1 分•作者: tonymet•7 个月前
我想真诚地向论坛上的许多在职和前员工提问。在你们开始怀疑之前，我想说明，是的，我理解电视的性能不足。但仍然有一些很棒的流媒体应用，它们的表现还算可以。<p>我所见过的糟糕的质量问题包括：<p>* 故意不复用已渲染的活动（例如，点击后退按钮会重新绘制并重新请求内容，导致令人痛苦的延迟）。<p>* 广告结束后不清理广告资源，导致播放掉帧和音频问题。<p>* 不记录已观看的广告，因此如果观众不小心关闭或跳过广告，就会重复播放广告（Netflix在这方面做得很好）。<p>* 耗尽大量内存——明显的内存泄漏和浪费。<p>* 搜索、播放、快进等用户界面设计糟糕，令人难以忍受。<p>当然，团队会受到时间和预算的限制，我理解这一点。但我很好奇，是什么样的偷工减料导致了如此糟糕的用户界面。考虑到人们需要每月支付订阅费，客户满意度非常重要，这尤其令人费解。<p>已知的违规者包括：Kanopy（向公共图书馆收取高额订阅费）、Peacock、HBO Max以及几乎所有其他流媒体应用。<p>Netflix和Amazon Prime在性能方面做得更好。
查看原文
A sincere question to the many actual & former employees on this forum. And before you get suspicious, yes I understand TVs are underpowered. There are still great streaming apps which perform adequately.<p>Horrendous quality issues I've seen:<p>* Deliberately not reusing rendered Activities (e.g. hitting the back button re-draws and re-requests content with painful latency).<p>* Not cleaning up Ads resources when the ad terminates, so playback drops frames and audio<p>* Not minding viewed ads, so viewers are punished with duplicate ads plays if they close or skip by accident (Netflix is quite mindful of this)<p>* exhausting massive memory -- clear memory leaks and waste<p>* humiliating UIs for search , playback , scrubbing , etc<p>Sure teams are time and budget constrained I get that. But I'm curious about actual stories of corner cutting leading to such painful UIs. It's especially bizarre given that people pay a monthly subscription, so c-sat is rather important.<p>Known violators are : Kanopy (which bills Public Libraries a hefty subscription), Peacock , HboMax and nearly every other streaming app.<p>Netflix and Amazon prime are better about performance.