提问 HN：你认为外星人正在访问地球吗？
3 分•作者: keepamovin•7 个月前
这里面有一些细微差别。我们把“外星人”定义为“非人类智慧生命”。我个人认为ET（地外生命）假说是成立的。也许你觉得UT（超地内生命）假说更有道理。或者“ED”（超维度，与“来自另一个星球/星系”相对）。
事实是：有大量证词，足以在法庭上定罪，涉及绑架、遭遇（各种“类型”）和“多传感器数据”。
事实是，这可以追溯到几个世纪前，那时我们根本无法设想“逆向工程”出类似的东西。所以，一定存在一些东西是超越我们当前人类文明的（这并不奇怪，你如何解释“原始人”建造巨型百吨砖石结构的方式）。
是的，对于HN上的一些人来说，这可能“具有挑衅性”。这就是重点。不是对抗性的，而仅仅是为了“引发”一个想法——更确切地说，是一个问题——“现实的本质是什么？”一个“更高”/更优越/更具科技感的智慧生命与我们和我们的星球互动，是与这个问题自然而然地联系在一起的。
信念很重要。因为，你的个人经历，对于其他人来说，就构成了一种信念。而这正是我们所拥有的“证据”的大部分。
趋势在整体上似乎很明显：披露即将到来。所以，我在这里想了解一下这个“知识分子/技术/好奇/世俗”（粗略分类）社区的脉搏。你认为这是真的吗？如果是，为什么？如果不是，为什么不？
如果我们得到“披露”（即，“一个‘受人尊敬的国家’的‘政府权威’明确声明‘外星人’接触的现实是真的），你的本体论/世界观会“崩溃”还是“稳固”，或者“其他”？
*为什么有这么多“引号”？我认识到与不同术语相关的含义和包袱的多样性。引号仅仅是对这种多样性的一种轻描淡写的致敬。就当如此，s'il vous plaît。
基本上，这篇文章旨在作为一个历史标记，用于衡量“披露前”时代一个重要群体的态度。所以，这是你记录官方观点的机会，在一切尘埃落定之前。你怎么说？
我非常感兴趣。
查看原文
So there's nuance here. Let's define "Aliens" as "non human sentiences". Personally, I think ET hypothesis is valid. Maybe you feel UT (ultra-terrestrial) hypothesis makes more sesne. Or "ED" ( extra-dimensional, as opposed to "from another planet/galaxy").<p>Facts: there's abundance of testimony that would secure conviction in court regarding abductions, encounters (of variosu "kinds"), and "multi-sensor data".<p>Truth is, it goes back centuries, before we could concievably have "RE'd" (reverse-engineered) anything similar. So there has to be something external to our current human civilization (not so surprising, how can you explain how megalithic 100-ton bricks structures were build by "primitives").<p>Yes, this is "provocative" (perhaps) for some on HN. That's the point. not adversarial, but simply to "provoke" a thought - rather, a question - "what is" the nature of reality? The existence of a "higher"/superior/more technological sentient intelligence interacting with us and our planet is a natural pairing with that question.<p>Belief is important. Because, your personal experience constitutes, for others, a belief. And that's much of the "evidence" we have.<p>Trend seems clear in gestalt: disclsoure is coming. So I ask here to take the pulse of this "intellectual/technical/curious/secular" (corase categroties) community. Do you believe this is real? If so, why? If not, why not?<p>If we were to get "DISCLOSURE" (ie, the "government authroity" of a "respect country" stating unequivocally that the reality of "alien" contact is true) woudl your ontology/worldview be "shattered" or "robust", or "otehr"?<p>*why so many "airquotes"? I recognize the plurality of meanings and layers of baggage associated with different terms. THe air-quotes are simply a glib nod to such multiplicity. Take as such, s'il vous plais.<p>Basically this post is to serve as a historical marker for taking the temperature of a significant collective in the "pre-disclosure" era. So this is your chance to record your official viewpoint, before it all comes down. What you say?<p>I am very interested.