HackerNews中文版

复制功能已经崩溃了。40年来一直如此。当你复制东西时，你真正想要的是什么？一个指向某物的引用。一种表达“这个，这里，我想在其他地方使用它”的方式。但你得到的是什么？一切。图像。格式。字体声明。元数据。整个 DOM 子树。一辆装满家具的 6MB 货车，而你需要的只是一个地址。我们把复制和囤积混淆了。而且这笔账算起来很疯狂。每天发生 400 亿次复制操作。平均负载：100KB 的没人需要的东西。这相当于 4EB 的数据驻留在 RAM 中，在设备之间同步，并被粘贴到按令牌收费的 AI 工具中。能源成本：每年 3300 万吨二氧化碳。相当于 700 万辆汽车的排放量。仅仅为了剪贴板格式。旧的复制方式：这是所有东西。囤起来。新的复制方式：这是一个引用。根据需要，在允许的情况下，获取你所需要的东西。所以我构建了解决方案。一个蛋。200 字节。一张领取凭证，而不是货物。接收者根据上下文打开它。粘贴到终端？纯文本。粘贴到 Figma？加载完整的资源。粘贴到不应该有访问权限的系统？什么也没有。复制 = 糖霜。剪切 = 蛋糕。观看演示：https://daaaave-atx.github.io/clipe96规范：https://github.com/daaaave-ATX/clipe96

查看原文

Copy is broken. It has been for 40 years.When you copy something, what do you actually want?A reference to a thing. A way to say "this, here, I want to use this somewhere else."What do you get instead?Everything. The image. The formatting. The font declarations. The metadata. The entire DOM subtree. A 6MB cargo truck full of furniture when all you needed was the address.We confused copying with hoarding.And the math is insane.40 billion copy operations happen every day. Average payload: 100KB of stuff nobody asked for. That's 4 exabytes sitting in RAM, syncing across devices, getting pasted into AI tools that charge per token.The energy cost: 33 million tons of CO2 annually. Seven million cars worth. For clipboard formatting.Old copy: Here's everything. Hoard it.New copy: Here's a reference. Fetch what you need, when you need it, if you're allowed.So I built the answer.An egg. 200 bytes. A claim ticket, not cargo.The receiver cracks it open based on context. Paste into a terminal? Plain text. Paste into Figma? Hydrate the full asset. Paste into a system that shouldn't have access? Nothing.Copy = Frosting. Cut = Cake.See it work: https://daaaave-atx.github.io/clipe96Spec: https://github.com/daaaave-ATX/clipe96

ClipEgg：我们把复制当成了囤积