提问 HN：硬科技和深科技——为什么 Jira 和 Confluence 是首选的项目管理工具？
1 分•作者: dnlh_lvg•7 个月前
真心好奇，对于从事硬科技和深科技（如航空航天、航海、核能、生物技术/制药等行业）的人来说——为什么Jira和Confluence仍然是主要的项目管理工具？
Atlassian是为软件工作流程而构建的，所以我理解为什么软件团队会依赖它。但对于硬件/运营密集型团队来说，我一直觉得它不太合适。
以下是我认为硬件/运营团队仍然使用它的原因，但我很想听听其他人的看法：
1）监管+数据安全要求（ITAR、出口管制、经过验证的系统等）将团队限制在他们组织多年前已经批准的工具中。//
2）传统+惯性。Jira/Confluence已经存在很久了，大多数公司已经在使用它们，而且没有人想成为尝试引入新事物的人。//
3）“至少每个人都知道如何使用它。”在混合组织（主要供应商<>供应商<>测试机构<>客户）中，Jira/Confluence是人们可以达成共识的最低限度工具，即使它们不太合适。//
4）没有人想采用或为另一个系统付费。硬件团队已经在处理电子表格、幻灯片、GSE数据库、准备情况跟踪器等。Jira和Confluence“足够好”，所以他们坚持使用。
如果Jira和Confluence不太适合硬件/运营工作，那么一个更好的工具实际上需要做什么？以及什么会使采用变得困难？
查看原文
Genuinely curious for folks working in hard tech and deep tech (industries like aerospace, aeronautics, maritime, nuclear, biotech/pharma, etc.) -- why are Jira and Confluence still the prominent tools for project management?<p>Atlassian was built for software workflows, so I get why software teams rely on it. But for hardware/ops-heavy teams, it always felt like an odd fit to me.<p>My take for why hardware/ops teams still use it are below but I'm curious to hear other people's opinions.<p>1) Regulatory + data security requirements (ITAR, export control, validated systems, etc.) box teams into whatever their org already approved years ago.//
2) Heritage + inertia. Jira/Confluence have been around forever, most companies already use them, and no one wants to be the person who tries to introduce something new.//
3) “At least everyone knows how to use it.” In mixed orgs (prime <> supplier <> test house <> customer), Jira/Confluence are the lowest common denominator tools people can agree on, even if they're a bad fit.//
4) No one wants to adopt or pay for another system. Hardware teams already juggle spreadsheets, slides, GSE databases, readiness trackers, etc. Jira and Confluence are “good enough,” so they stick.<p>If Jira and Confluence aren't a great fit for hardware/ops work, what would a better tool actually need to do? And what would make adoption difficult?