Arduino 之死
2 分•作者: ChuckMcM•7 个月前
关于高通为何要为 Arduino 支付如此高昂的费用，这里有很多猜测。我认为这个问题已经在 Limor Freid（AdaFruit 的 LadaAda）的 LinkedIn 帖子中得到了解答：https://www.linkedin.com/posts/adafruit_opensource-privacy-techpolicy-activity-7396903362237054976-r14H
我知道很多人都避开 LinkedIn，但其中两个关键点是，高通的新“服务条款”明确禁止逆向工程，声称拥有提交到该平台的任何内容的知识产权，并声称有权将与连接到 Arduino 的帐户相关联的任何和所有数据用于他们想要的几乎任何目的。Limor 详细阐述了这一点，但最终我同意她的评估，即这将是 Arduino 的终结。
查看原文
There was a lot of speculation here about <i>why</i> Qualcomm would pay so much for Arduino. I believe that question has been answered by Limor Freid (LadaAda of AdaFruit) in her LinkedIn post here: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/adafruit_opensource-privacy-techpolicy-activity-7396903362237054976-r14H/<p>I know a lot of people avoid LinkedIn like the plague, but the two key bits are that Qualcomm's new "Terms of Service" explicitly disallow reverse engineering, claim IP ownership of anything submitted to the platform, and claim a right to use any and all data associated with accounts connected to Arduino for pretty much any purpose they want. Limor goes into more detail but at the end of the day I agree with her assessment that this will be the end of Arduino.