Ask HN: 为什么 Cursor 和 Windsurf 可以不标注其模型来源?

1作者: bluelightning2k7 个月前
Windsurf 的 SWE-1.5 确实不错,我也听说 Cursor 的模型也很好。<p>然而,我一直有个挥之不去的感觉:未经授权使用基础模型是不对的。<p>我知道他们做了一些后训练,并且优化了推理,但使用像 LLM 这样重要的东西,却连个感谢都没有,感觉非常不妥。<p>我想问的是,无论许可证允许什么,这样做到底是怎么被允许的?
查看原文
Windsurf&#x27;s SWE-1.5 is really good, and I&#x27;ve heard good things about Cursor&#x27;s model too.<p>However there&#x27;s this nagging feeling I just can&#x27;t shake: using the base models without credit is not OK.<p>I know they&#x27;ve done some post-training and a lot of work optimizing the inference, but to use something as substantial as an LLM and not even credit them feels super wrong.<p>I guess my question is how is this OK, regardless of what the licenses allow.