理论:如何实现人人摆脱贫困
1 分•作者: AdityaNa15•7 个月前
经济系统是不稳定的。财富集中并停留在那里。因此,生产资料和商品也随之集中。<p>这一点在全球收入和财富图表中得到了突出体现。它们清楚地显示了一个差距,收入图表的底部没有收入(用于食物等基本必需品),而财富图表的底部显示底层没有储蓄。<p>我提议一项计划来解决这种财富集中“掠夺”底层的系统性问题。<p>首先,我成立了一家公司,Myshkin (www.myshkin.club)。Myshkin 是一家提供外卖服务的自助餐厅。实际上,您可以通过手机随时连接到自助餐,每月收费 1000 美元。<p>这为社会上有钱人提供了食物。<p>然后,我将从该组织获得的剩余餐点捐赠给整个城市的宗教机构,以便城市中的穷人可以免费享用。我用 Myshkin 的利润来弥补任何差额。<p>这为社会上没有钱的人提供了食物。<p>现在,每个人都吃饱了,这解决了收入分配中的第一个差距:现在每个人都能获得食物。<p>但系统中还存在第二个差距,即财富差距。如果你忽略底层人民已经吃饱的事实,金钱本身仍然会集中到顶端并循环。底层人民吃饱了,但仍然很穷。我喜欢这样描述:“如果每个人每年都能买得起 iPhone,资本主义就会变得更大。” 然而,金钱仍然集中。<p>为此,我建议我们建立一种去中心化的货币,作为 Myshkin 交易的收据。所以现在每个月,客户支付 1000 美元,并获得 600 张收据。<p>这增加了货币流通量。所以现在人们可以买更多东西。一开始只是一点点,然后是很多。假设全球人民支付 1000 美元并获得 10,000 张收据。更多的货币流通量。<p>然而,问题并没有解决,因为金钱,美元和收据,仍然集中。<p>直到我们按下开关。<p>在开关之前,资本主义中的一切在财务上都是糟糕的举动。一切都在拿走你的钱。我们被困在被拉扯中。<p>开关包括以下内容:
* 之前
* 损失 1000 美元
* 获得 10,000 张收据
* 现在
* 获得你想要的任何东西
* 只有当你拿太多时才会损失<p>这个开关改变了系统,因为它现在规则本身就说金钱是充足的。想拿多少钱就拿多少钱。如果你拿了超过一百万张收据,我们会限制你。<p>这有利于资本主义。为什么?因为现在每个人都能买得起 iPhone。苹果公司飞速发展。每家公司都是如此。<p>我们又回到了互相服务。<p>此后不久,我们拿出多余的钱,购买我们自己需要的所有自动化设备,以便将我们自己从业务中自动化出来。这将在 3 年内实现。<p>有了所有的钱,我们就可以将自己从经济中自动化出来。<p>我们将控制收入和财富图表,以反映丰裕。
查看原文
The economic system is unstable. Wealth concentrates and stays there. As such, the means of production and also the goods concentrate as well.<p>This is highlighted in the income and wealth global graphs. They clearly show a gap where the bottom of the income chart receives no money (for bare necessities like food), and the bottom of the wealth chart shows the bottom have no savings.<p>I propose a plan to solve this systemic problem of wealth concentration “rugging” the bottom.<p>First, I set up a company, Myshkin (www.myshkin.club). Myshkin is a buffet that delivers. Effectively, you’re always connected to a buffet via your phone, for a monthly fee of $1000.<p>This feeds the people with money in society.<p>Then, I take the excess meals from the organization, and I donate them to religious institutions throughout a city, so that they may be had by the poor within a city for free. I make up any difference with the profits from Myshkin.<p>This feeds the people without money in society.<p>Now, everyone’s fed, which cures the first gap in the income distribution: now everyone receives food.<p>There is but the second gap in the system, in the wealth gap. If you ignore that the people at the bottom are fed, the money itself still concentrates to the top and swirls. The bottom are fed but still poor. And the way I like to describe this is that “if everyone could afford iPhones every year, Capitalism would be bigger.” And yet the money still concentrates.<p>For this I propose that we establish a decentralized currency as the receipts of Myshkin’s transactions. So now every month, customers pay $1000, and get 600 Receipts.<p>This increases monetary flow. So now the people can buy more. By a little bit at first, then a lot. Say globally people pay $1000 and get 10,000 Receipts. More monetary flow.<p>And yet the problem isn’t solved because the money, dollars and Receipts, concentrates still.<p>Until we flip the switch.<p>Before the switch, everything in capitalism is a bad move financially. Everything takes your money. And we’re stuck in being pulled.<p>The switch consists of the following:
* Before
* Lose $1000
* Gain 10,000 Receipts
* Now
* Gain however much you want
* Lose only if you take too much<p>This switch changes the system by virtue of the fact that now the rules themselves say money is abundant. Take as much money as you want. If you take over a million Receipts we’ll throttle you.<p>This odds beneficial to Capitalism. Why? Because now everyone can afford iPhones. Apple grows through the roof. Every company does.<p>And we get back to serving one another.<p>Shortly thereafter, we take the extra money and we buy all of the automation we ourselves need to automate ourselves out of our business. It’s coming in 3 years.<p>And with all the money, we automate ourselves out of the economy.<p>And we control the income and the wealth graphs to reflect abundance.