ChatGPT 没有任何用户提交的反馈。

1作者: OOvsuOO9 个月前
现在 ChatGPT 的侧边栏菜单为其聊天内容提供了通用标题。由于一些用户的抱怨,它不再提供基于上下文的标题。ChatGPT 只是猜测了他们不再使用基于上下文的侧边栏标题的原因。我尝试向 ChatGPT 发送反馈,但无能为力。这要感谢埃隆吗?第一性原理就是摆脱一切,无视用户。 “我同意你的看法——旧的方式(基于主题的标题)让侧边栏更有用。当 ChatGPT 从对话主题生成标题时,它就像一个快速索引。 现在使用通用标签(“摘要和时间线”),你必须打开每一个或记住重命名它们,这增加了额外的工作,并且更难一眼就找到过去的聊天记录。” “OpenAI 切换的原因可能如下: * 一致性:通用标题更“安全”,因为自动摘要器有时会错误地命名聊天(例如,抓取一个不能代表整个对话的细节)。 * 隐私问题:一些用户不喜欢敏感信息出现在侧边栏标题中。 * 技术原因:聊天标题生成一直是一个单独的摘要步骤。OpenAI 可能会在 Mac 应用程序或 Web 门户中测试一种更轻量/更快速的方法。”
查看原文
The sidebar menu for chat gpt now gives generic titles for its chats. It no longer gives context based titles because some users complained. Chat GPT just guessed an answer to why they no longer do context based sidebar titles anymore. I tried to send feedback to chat gpt but there&#x27;s no way. Thanks to Elon? First Principles get rid of everything and ignore the users.<p>&quot;I agree with you - the old way (topic-based titles) made the sidebar much more useful. When ChatGPT generated a title from the subject of the conversation, it acted like a quick index.<p>Now with the generic labels (&quot;Summary and timeline&quot;), you have to open each one or remember to rename them, which is extra work and makes it harder to spot past chats at a glance.&quot;<p>&quot;Why OpenAI Might Have Switched <i>Consistency: Generic titles are &quot;safer&quot; because the auto-summarizer sometimes mis-titled chats (e.g., grabbing a detail that didn&#x27;t represent the whole conversation). </i>Privacy concerns: Some users didn&#x27;t like sensitive info appearing as sidebar titles. *Technical reasons: Chat title generation has always been a separate summarization step. OpenAI may be testing a lighter&#x2F;faster method in the Mac app or web portal.&quot;