如果人工智能取代了工作，谁来买东西？
8 分•作者: babua•9 个月前
人工智能代理正在被整合到各行各业。公司会使用它们，因为它们速度快且成本低。但如果代理取代了大量有偿工作，人们就会失去收入。收入减少 → 支出减少 → 企业更加大力推动自动化。感觉像一个循环。<p>更低的价格确实有帮助，但如果人们没有工资单，那就没用了。可能会出现新的工作，但我并不确信时机合适。而且，如果大部分收益都流向少数几个所有者，他们额外的支出也无法取代其他所有人的需求。<p>那么，究竟是什么维持了需求？利润分成，让工人拥有股份？某种来自“自动化红利”的收入下限？能够吸收所有这些产出的全新市场？或者，也许是现实世界的限制（能源、计算、监管）减缓了发展速度。我可能遗漏了什么——这里的具体机制是什么？
查看原文
AI agents are getting rolled into everything. Companies will use them because they’re fast and cheap. But if agents replace a lot of paid work, people lose income. Less income → less spending → businesses push even harder on automation. Feels like a loop.<p>Cheaper prices help, sure, but not if folks don’t have paychecks. New jobs might show up, but I’m not convinced the timing works. Also, if most gains go to a few owners, their extra spending won’t replace everyone else’s demand.<p>So what actually keeps demand up? Profit-sharing so workers own a piece? Some kind of income floor from “automation dividends”? Totally new markets that soak up all this output? Or maybe real-world limits (energy, compute, regulation) slow things down. I might be missing something—what’s the concrete mechanism here?