Ask HN：公开举报行为？
1 分•作者: Guid_NewGuid•9 个月前
关于这篇[0]关于削减 mRNA 疫苗资金以支持活病毒疫苗的报道，在发布后几分钟内就被迅速标记为已删除，我想知道是否有人支持公开标记行为？
据我所知，HN 的代码库基本上是只写模式，所以这可能是一个很高的要求，但我认为，如果人们可以自行调查哪些账户在第一时间就对帖子进行删除操作，这将有助于提升大家对该网站的信心，尤其是在当今全球动荡的时期。
无论你的政治立场如何，这都很有用，例如在以色列-巴勒斯坦等问题上。
对于这个例子中的报道，有几种可能性：
* 人们厌倦了“政治”报道，并因厌烦而将其标记为删除
* 该网站上活跃用户中，亲特朗普、反科学的观点占多数
* 存在活跃的影响力活动，使用傀儡账户来隐藏和阻止对正在进行的科学攻击的讨论
最有可能的答案是以上所有情况都存在。但是，为什么像标记这样的反言论行为应该保密呢？这可能已经可以通过 API 实现，如果真是这样，我很乐意了解更多。
\[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44961584
查看原文
Apropos this story[0] about cuts to mRNA vaccine funding in favor of live virus vaccine being flagged to death within mere minutes of posting I'm wondering if there would be support for flagging activity being made public?<p>It is my understanding that the HN code-base is pretty much write-only so it's probably a tall ask but I think it would help confidence in the site at this... turbulent time globally, if people could do their own investigation of which accounts are jumping on stories to kill them.<p>This would be useful irrespective of your political slant, e.g. on issues like Israel-Palestine.<p>For the example story there are a few possibilities:<p>- people are sick of 'political' stories and flag them out of tedium<p>- there is a prevailing pro-Trump, anti-science majority of active users on the site<p>- there are active influence campaigns using sock-puppet accounts to hide and prevent discussion of ongoing attacks on science<p>The most likely answer is all-of-the-above. But why should such anti-speech activity as flagging be private? This may already be possible via the API so I'd be interested to learn that if so.<p>[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44961584