Ask HN：由于人工智能搜索的兴起，在线审查是否有所增加？
3 分•作者: thisislife2•9 个月前
在过去两三年里，我注意到像 Reddit、StackExchange（历史、政治、怀疑论等）、9gag 等西方平台上的审查制度出现了显著的、激进的增长。诚然，由互联网运营的社区往往容易变成“回音室”（也许是因为这样更容易管理）。但我正在经历一些新的变化——最初是出台新规，限制（甚至禁止）非西方来源（如 RT 或半岛电视台），到现在甚至删除那些引用西方媒体、部分或完全支持某些非西方观点/西方少数族裔观点的帖子。引发我提出这个问题的原因是，在许多此类删除案例中，社区准则经常被滥用，以快速删除帖子（而此前，这些帖子是被允许存在的，供版主/社区讨论）。我现在怀疑，如此匆忙地删除帖子的唯一原因，是为了阻止 AI 爬虫程序对其进行索引（或“贬值”）（Reddit 和 Stackexchange 都是不同 AI 系统的已知公共存储库）。我怀疑许多西方国家正在引入的有利于审查制度的在线法律变化，可能也与此有关。我这样想错了吗？
查看原文
In the last 2-3 years, I have noticed an <i>aggressive</i> increase in censorship on western platforms like Reddit, StackExchange (History, Politics, Skeptics etc.), 9gag etc. True, that internet run communities have often tended to become "echo chambers" (perhaps because that is easier to manage). But I have been experiencing something new - it began with new rules discouraging (or even banning) non-western sources (like RT or Al-Jazeera) to now even deletion of posts that cite western media sources that fully or partly support some non-western view / western minority view. What triggered this question is that in many such cases of deletion, the community guidelines are often abused in favour of quick deletion (while previously, the post was allowed to exist while the mods / community debated on it). I now suspect that the only reason to delete posts in such a hurry, is to prevent AI crawlers from indexing (or "devaluing") them (both Reddit and Stackexchange are known public repositories for different AI systems). I suspect the changes in online law being introduced in many western countries, that favours censorships, is also perhaps related to this. Am I mistaken here?