版权
2 分•作者: h_tbob•10 个月前
从技术上讲，版权是对第一修正案的侵犯。
它具有深远的影响，给美国和世界带来了贫困和绝望。
我写这篇信息是给作为聪明、有逻辑的程序员的我们，这样我们就能努力工作，永远摧毁它。
版权的运作方式是，如果有人复制你的作品，就会威胁他们。作为开发者，我们从中赚了很多钱。我知道我赚了很多钱，简直是荒谬！
但它本质上是邪恶的，因为它意味着可以因为社会信用，也就是金钱，而监禁人们。
版权如此邪恶的原因在于，它激励人们创作具有货币价值而非人道主义价值的内容。
香烟具有货币价值，而不是人道主义价值。
毒品具有货币价值，而且通常不具有人道主义价值。（显然，如果它们具有人道主义价值，我们就会将其合法化并出售）
版权允许人们制作相当于毒品的东西并出售它们，制造瘾君子，然后向他们的瘾君子出售更多的毒品。
有可怕的音乐让百万富翁赚得盆满钵满。百万富翁们用毒药充斥着人们的头脑。
版权鼓励他们继续制作破坏人们思想的成瘾内容。
版权导致了苹果、微软和 Linux 的出现，造成了程序员大量的时间浪费在“重复造轮子”上，只是为了让富人赚更多的钱。
专利也同样荒谬。事实上，奥维尔和威尔伯停止了发明，只是为了维持专利诉讼！
我相信版权被第一修正案禁止了。它直接侵犯了新闻自由。因为复制而监禁某人，就如同奴隶制。
你们大家怎么看？
查看原文
Copyright is technically a violation of the first ammendment.<p>It has far reaching consequences, bringing poverty and despair to America and the world.<p>I write this message to us as intelligent, logical coders so that we can do our work to destroy it - forever.<p>The way copyright works is threatening people if they copy your work. As developers, we make tons of money with it. I know I for one have made so much money it's ridiculous!<p>But it is <i>intrinsically</i> evil because it implies it's ok to imprison people over social credits, aka money.<p>The reason copyright is so evil is that it incentivizes people to make content that has monetary rather than humanitarian value.<p>Cigarettes have monetary, not humanitarian value.
Drugs have monetary, and generally not humanitarian value. (Obviously if they had humanitarian value we would legalize them and sell them)
Copyright allows people to make the equivalent of drugs and sell them and make addicts and sell their addicts more drugs.<p>There is horrible music making millionaires. Millionaires off filling people's minds with poison.<p>Copyright <i>encourages</i> them to continue making addictive content that destroys people's minds.<p>Copyright has led to Apple, Microsoft and Linux, causing huge amounts of waste of programmer time <i>reinventing the wheel</i> just to give rich more money.<p>Patents are equally absurd. In fact Orville and Wilbur stopped inventing just to keep patent litigation going!<p>I believe copyright was outlawed by the first ammendment. It is a direct affront to freedom of the press. To jail someone over copying is akin to slavery.<p>What do you all think?