Show HN: 数据所有权条款测验，提高对限制性数据权利的认知
1 分•作者: ahaucnx•5 个月前
我刚刚创建了一个小测验，揭示了企业法律语言如何将社区困在失去对其环境数据控制权的境地中。
它基于空气质量监测设备制造商的典型条款和条件。
试试看，看看你是否能发现其中的危险信号：
[https://www.airgradient.com/aq-data-ownership-quiz/](https://www.airgradient.com/aq-data-ownership-quiz/)
这个游戏的目的是提高大家对数据所有权权利的认识，例如：
- “共同所有权”实际上并非共享
- 为什么“免费”服务经常在没有警告的情况下删除你的数据
- 订阅模式如何将你社区的空气质量数据“劫持”
- 数据访问和数据所有权之间的区别
这款游戏的设计灵感来自于EPIC空气质量基金会的杰出工作，该基金会致力于扩大空气质量数据的获取。他们的研究表明，近40%的国家缺乏开放的空气质量数据——这通常是因为限制性的企业条款阻止社区真正拥有他们的环境信息。
在AirGradient，我们认为开源硬件是最终的解决方案。当社区同时控制硬件和数据时，他们才能实现真正的环境正义。
查看原文
I just created a quiz that reveals how corporate legal language can trap communities into losing control of their environmental data.<p>It is based on real terms and conditions typical for air quality monitoring manufacturers.<p>Try it and see if you can spot the red flags:
<a href="https://www.airgradient.com/aq-data-ownership-quiz/" rel="nofollow">https://www.airgradient.com/aq-data-ownership-quiz/</a><p>The aim of the game is to create awareness among data ownership rights, e.g.:<p>- How "joint ownership" isn't really sharing
- Why "free" services often delete your data without warning
- How subscription models hold your community's air quality data hostage
- The difference between data access and data ownership<p>The game was inspired by the incredible work of the EPIC Air Quality Fund, which is fighting to expand access to air quality data. Their research revealed that nearly 40% of countries lack open air quality data—often because restrictive corporate terms prevent communities from truly owning their environmental information.<p>At AirGradient, we believe open source hardware is the ultimate solution. When communities control both the hardware AND the data, they achieve true environmental justice.