DHH 谈 Lex Fridman：一场长达数小时的 Ruby on Rails 颂歌，但它真的好吗？
1 分•作者: oleksandr_dem•5 个月前
过去几天，我一直在听 Lex 采访 DHH（只听了编程部分，我对他在其他话题上的观点不太感兴趣）。
这已经不是我第一次听到人们称赞 Ruby on Rails 了，但每次我查看文档时，我都会想：“我不明白为什么人们会喜欢它。”
我对 Ruby 的主要批评是：
* 语法不太好：它使用了大量的特殊字符，这使得编写代码的速度变慢。
* 没有静态类型：当我刚开始编程时，动态类型（比如 JavaScript 中的）似乎很酷。但在大型企业项目中工作之后，我再也不会选择动态类型语言了（根据 DHH 的说法，这可能让我成为一个“糟糕的开发者”）。
我还没有亲自尝试过它，主要是因为将编程语言用于业余项目和专业产品是完全不同的体验（有人可能会尝试 JavaScript 并认为它比 TypeScript 更好，直到他们不得不重构某些东西）。
所以我想知道，这是否是那种工具主要被一小部分狂热爱好者使用的案例，所以所有的反馈都是正面的？还是说，一旦你深入了解 Rails，它真的像 DHH 说的那样好用？
查看原文
Over the past few days, I've been listening to Lex interview DHH (just the programming parts, I'm not particularly interested in his views on other topics).<p>It's not the first time I've heard people praising Ruby on Rails, but every time I look at the documentation, I find myself thinking, "I don’t get why people are into this.".<p>My main critiques of Ruby are:
- The syntax isn't great: it uses a lot of special characters, which makes writing the code slower.
- No static types: when I first started programming, dynamic typing (like in JavaScript) seemed cool. But after working on large enterprise projects, there’s no way I’d choose a dynamically typed language again (Based on what DHH says, that probably makes me a "bad developer").<p>I haven't tried it myself, mainly because using a programming language for a side project versus a professional product is a completely different experience (someone might try JavaScript and argue it’s better than TypeScript, until they have to refactor something).<p>So I'm wondering, is this one of those cases where a tool is mainly used by a passionate niche, so all the feedback is positive? Or is Rails really as good as DHH says it is once you get into it?