问 HN：我们该如何应对州身份证立法？
3 分•作者: VerdisQuo5678•5 个月前
7月25日，英国政府将开始强制执行身份验证，以访问色情网站。任何允许英国居民连接的网站都必须遵守规定，否则将面临巨额罚款。监管机构Ofcom已命令大型网站（如Reddit，已不再允许匿名访问英国的NSFW子版块）和小型网站（某些约会应用程序、Grindr等）遵守规定。有趣的是，这项法律仅影响“用户对用户”的内容，而不是所有色情网站。此外，美国法院现在支持各州的身份验证法律：https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44397799，欧盟也计划推出身份验证基础设施。
即使你对此毫不在意，或者讨厌色情内容，你也可以清楚地看到第一世界的走向。上述美国裁决已经涵盖了任何性相关内容，甚至是文字，自然包括LGBT话题和性教育。我们能做些什么来对抗这种趋势，并让开放的互联网再维持一段时间呢？
我能想到的最好办法是创建一个类似于Neocities的网站，但用于Tor网络，这样可以更容易地将一些有用的内容转移到更少窥探的地方。我也对这个问题缺乏报道感到沮丧，几年前，当各州开始推出身份验证时，这还是值得报道的新闻，甚至在其他国家也是如此。现在却连一点动静都没有，这有点超现实。
查看原文
On July 25th the UK government will start enforcing ID checks to access porn sites. Any site which allows UK residents to connect to is forced to comply, or face major fines. Ofcom, the regulator, has ordered both large (like Reddit which no longer allows anonymous access to NSFW subreddits in the UK) and niche sites (Certain dating apps, grindr, etc) to comply. Somewhat interestingly this law only effects "user-to-user" content instead of all porn sites. Additionally US courts now uphold state ID laws https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44397799 and the EU is planning to roll out ID verification infrastructure aswell.<p>Even if you could not care less, or hate porn, you can clearly see the direction the first world is going in. The aforementioned US ruling already includes anything sexual, even text, naturally including LGBT topics and sex education. Is there anything we can do to combat this and hold out the open internet a little longer?<p>The best I can think of is a neocities but for tor, making it easy to transition some useful content to somewhere with less prying eyes. I am also dismayed about the lack of coverage on this issue, a few years ago when states started rolling out ID verification it was news worthy, even in other countries. Now not even a blip on the radar, its somewhat surreal.