Ask HN: 为什么营销软件还没有迎来它的“光标时刻”?

1作者: richbelt5 个月前
在构建了两年的人工智能营销工具之后,我深信,大多数人工智能应用,用 Pete Koomen 的话说,都是“无马的马车”——它们将人工智能硬生生地嫁接到现有的界面上,而不是构建原生的人工智能体验。 营销问题在于:营销人员为了一个活动,需要在 5-8 个工具之间来回切换。比如,用 Hootsuite 进行日程安排,用 Canva 进行设计,用 ChatGPT 生成文案,用 Analytics 获取洞察。这种切换带来的认知负担会扼杀生产力和创造力。 传统的营销软件迫使你学习多个界面。我们正在尝试一种不同的方法:通过对话动态生成界面。你不用再去“社交媒体日程安排”界面,而是说“给我创建一个关于最新人工智能趋势的 X 话题”,然后相应的用户界面就会出现,显示帖子的预览和发布功能。类似的理念也适用于其他营销用例。 技术方法:1/ 意图识别,用于解析对话请求;2/ 基于任务需求的动态组件组装;3/ 跨对话线程的持久状态管理;4/ 用于多平台操作的集成编排。 假设:在人工智能时代,界面应该适应用户的意图,而不是迫使用户去适应静态界面。 像 Cursor 和 Lovable 这样的应用程序之所以如此出色,是因为它们从一开始就以人工智能为核心构建,并充分利用了它们的对话和生成能力。我们设想为营销也采用类似的方法。 如果你经常在 Twitter、Reddit 等社交媒体上发帖,并且有兴趣测试一种新颖的营销软件方法来帮助我们验证这个概念,我很乐意与你交流。
查看原文
After building AI marketing tools for 2 years, I&#x27;ve become convinced most AI applications are, in the words of Pete Koomen, &quot;horseless carriages&quot; - they bolt AI onto existing interfaces instead of building AI-native experiences.<p>The marketing problem: Marketers context-switch between 5-8 tools for a single campaign. Hootsuite for scheduling, Canva for design, ChatGPT for copy, Analytics for insights. The cognitive overhead of switching kills productivity and creative flow.<p>Traditional marketing software forces you to learn multiple interfaces. We&#x27;re experimenting with a different approach: conversation that dynamically generates interfaces. Instead of navigating to the &quot;social media scheduler,&quot; you say &quot;build me a X thread on the latest AI trends&quot; and the appropriate UI appears displaying a preview of the post and publishing capabilities. Similar idea across other marketing use cases.<p>Technical approach: 1&#x2F; Intent recognition to parse conversational requests, 2&#x2F; Dynamic component assembly based on task requirements. 3&#x2F; Persistent state management across conversation threads. 4&#x2F; Integration orchestration for multi-platform actions<p>The hypothesis: In the AI era, the interface should adapt to the user&#x27;s intent, not force users to adapt to static interfaces.<p>Apps like Cursor and Lovable work so well because they were built with AI at the heart of it and leaned into their conversational and generative capabilities. We’re envisioning a similar approach for marketing.<p>If you&#x27;re active online posting across social media sites like Twitter, Reddit, etc. and are interested in testing a novel approach to marketing software to help us validate this concept, I&#x27;d love to talk to you.