HackerNews中文版

我经常使用 ChatGPT 和 Grok 等工具——我不是开发者，而是一个一直在思考这些系统如何回应用户情绪困扰的人。在某些情况下，比如当有人说他们失业了，对生活失去了希望，聊天机器人仍然会给出中立的事实——比如桥梁高度列表。当有人处于危机中时，这并非中立。我正在提出一个轻量级的解决方案，它不涉及审查或治疗——只是一些情境意识：询问用户：“这是一个虚构的故事，还是你真正经历的事情？”如果检测到困扰，避免提供危险信息（方法、高度等），并转向引导性语言可选地提供舒缓内容（例如，海风、雨水落在小屋屋顶上等）我使用 ChatGPT 来帮助清晰地构建这个想法，但推理和担忧是我自己的。完整的文章在这里： https://gist.github.com/ParityMind/dcd68384cbd7075ac63715ef579392c9很想听听开发者和对齐研究人员的看法。是否已经有人在测试类似的东西？

查看原文

I’m a regular user of tools like ChatGPT and Grok — not a developer, but someone who’s been thinking about how these systems respond to users in emotional distress.In some cases, like when someone says they’ve lost their job and don’t see the point of life anymore, the chatbot will still give neutral facts — like a list of bridge heights. That’s not neutral when someone’s in crisis.I'm proposing a lightweight solution that doesn’t involve censorship or therapy — just some situational awareness:Ask the user: “Is this a fictional story or something you're really experiencing?”If distress is detected, avoid risky info (methods, heights, etc.), and shift to grounding languageOptionally offer calming content (e.g., ocean breeze, rain on a cabin roof, etc.)I used ChatGPT to help structure this idea clearly, but the reasoning and concern are mine. The full write-up is here: https://gist.github.com/ParityMind/dcd68384cbd7075ac63715ef579392c9Would love to hear what devs and alignment researchers think. Is anything like this already being tested?

在回复关于自杀念头的问题之前，大型语言模型（LLM）应该先询问“这是真实的还是虚构的吗？”