Ask HN：你认为出现一个 MCP 的替代品会有用吗？
3 分•作者: empire23•7 个月前
大家好，
我一直在与 MCP 较劲，并且不断发现它存在同样的弱点：
* 中间件服务器感觉完全没有必要，而且过于复杂
* 由于标准制定仓促，它有太多的安全漏洞
* 它的文档编写得太差，令人困惑
我一直在考虑制定一个新的协议，但我太清楚那幅老漫画了（https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/standards\_2x.png）
但还是想问问大家——尝试构建一个可扩展、安全的 MCP 新版本有价值吗？
或者我应该坚持使用目前流行的协议？
查看原文
Hi everyone,<p>I've been wrestling with MCP, and keep finding the same weaknesses:
- the middleware server feels completely unncessary and overly complex
- it has too many security flaws due to what feels like a rushed out standard
- it's just so poorly undocumented and confusing<p>I've been thinking of doing a new protocol, but am too aware of that ol' comic (https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/standards_2x.png)<p>Yet was curious to ask you guys - is there value in trying to build a new scalable, secure version of MCP?<p>Or should I just stick to the protocol that's currently popular?