我们需要一个抗审查的真相协议——我有想法，但缺乏技术。
2 分•作者: PowerQuestion•6 个月前
我一直在思考一个问题，很久了。我不是开发者，也不从事加密货币相关工作，更没有技术能力来构建这个东西。但我一直在关注世界各地出现的审查和叙事控制趋势——而且我再也无法忽视它了。
现在，说政府——无论是专制的还是“民主的”——正在公开努力限制某些信息的传播，这已经不再是阴谋论了。他们甚至都不试图掩盖。他们监管平台，强制下架，威胁罚款，并使用“虚假信息”作为法律杠杆。他们真正害怕的不是混乱，甚至不是谎言。他们害怕的是未经过滤的真相。
未经解读、贴标签、由“合作伙伴”进行事实核查或被算法掩埋的真相。这种真相是原始的、令人不安的、不可预测的，而且——最重要的是——无法控制的。
而这正是我认为我们需要保护的。我相信我们需要一个协议——不是公司，不是平台，不是品牌——它让真相在功能上无法被审查。不是因为审查真相是违法的，而是因为从技术和社会角度来看，这样做是不可行的。
我们已经看到了当权力感到受到威胁时会发生什么：平台被收买，创始人受到压力，政策发生变化。即使是承诺成为“言论自由”平台的推特，也已经开始屈服。脸书与政府结盟。YouTube可以因为视频中包含错误的医学观点而将其删除。Substack和Rumble可能暂时还能坚持，但它们仍然是扼喉点。仍然可以被针对。仍然很脆弱。
我们需要的是类似真相的活生生的、有生命力的免疫系统。一个以与种子网络分发文件相同的方式分发敏感或关键信息的协议——冗余、不可逆转且自主。它允许人们举报腐败、滥用权力、伪善、浪费——并以任何单一实体都无法删除的方式上传、验证、分析和发布这些证据。
理想情况下，这将包括匿名举报的机制。基于人工智能的模式检测，以连接不同案例之间的点。对政治家、法官、机构、部门进行公开评分。追踪承诺与交付的对比。基于行动而非营销的声誉。公共资金的可追溯性。默认的彻底透明。一切都由去中心化存储和共识支持。
我知道，其中一些可能已经部分存在。但它没有统一起来。它不是万无一失的。它不被信任。而且最重要的是，它不是从头开始设计的，只有一个目标：让真相势不可挡。
这个想法——我称之为VERITAS——与意识形态无关。它不分左右。它不关心党派。它只关心事实、证据和问责制。而且它应该从根本上与被拥有、货币化、收买或关闭不相容。
我知道这听起来雄心勃勃。但我相信这是必要的。今天的国家，它之所以存在，不是通过合法性——而是通过叙事控制。如果我们拿走这一点——不是用暴力，不是用混乱，而是用冷酷、坚硬、数据驱动的透明度——我们可以从根本上改变权力的运作方式。
所以，这是我的邀请。我不是在寻求捐款。我没有要发布任何东西。我只是想看看是否有人也感受到同样的紧迫感。他们了解这个问题的技术层面，并且可能想勾勒出一个这样的系统会是什么样子。
复制这个想法。窃取它。在此基础上构建。改进它。让它比我所想象的更好。或者联系我——我很乐意一起工作。我只是希望它存在。因为我们正在耗尽时间，而且墙壁正在逼近。一旦真相完全被许可——我们就失去了一切。
让我们现在就让它无法被审查，在为时已晚之前。
查看原文
Here’s something that’s been on my mind for a while. I’m not a developer, I don’t work in crypto, I don’t have technical skills to build this. But I’ve been watching the trend of censorship and narrative control around the world — and I can’t unsee it anymore.<p>It’s no longer a conspiracy theory to say that governments — authoritarian or “democratic” — are now openly working to limit the distribution of certain kinds of information. They don’t even try to hide it. They regulate platforms, force takedowns, threaten fines, and use "disinformation" as a legal crowbar. What they really fear isn’t chaos, or even lies. What they fear is unfiltered truth.<p>Truth that hasn’t been interpreted, branded, fact-checked by “partners,” or algorithmically buried. Truth that’s raw, uncomfortable, unpredictable, and — most of all — uncontainable.<p>And that’s exactly what I think we need to protect. I believe we need a protocol — not a company, not a platform, not a brand — that makes truth functionally impossible to censor. Not because it’s illegal to censor it, but because it’s technically and socially unviable to do so.<p>We’ve seen what happens when power feels threatened: platforms are co-opted, founders are pressured, policies change. Even Twitter, which promised to be the “free speech” platform, is already bending. Facebook is state-aligned. YouTube can kill a video for having the wrong medical take. Substack and Rumble may hold out for now, but they’re still choke points. Still targetable. Still fragile.<p>What we need is something like a living, breathing immune system for truth. A protocol that distributes sensitive or critical information the same way a torrent network distributes files — redundantly, irreversibly, and autonomously. Something that allows people to report corruption, abuse of power, hypocrisy, waste — and have that evidence uploaded, validated, analyzed, and published in a way that no single entity can erase.<p>Ideally, this would include mechanisms for anonymous whistleblowing. AI-based pattern detection to connect dots across cases. Public scoring for politicians, judges, institutions, agencies. Tracking of promises made vs. delivered. Reputation based on action, not marketing. Public money traceability. Radical transparency by default. And everything backed by decentralized storage and consensus.<p>I know, some of this may already exist in parts. But it’s not unified. It’s not bulletproof. It’s not trusted. And most importantly, it’s not designed from the ground up with one goal in mind: to make truth unstoppable.<p>This idea — I call it VERITAS — isn’t about ideology. It’s not left or right. It doesn’t care about parties. It only cares about facts, evidence, and accountability. And it should be fundamentally incompatible with being owned, monetized, co-opted, or shut down.<p>I know this sounds ambitious. But I believe it’s necessary. The State, as it exists today, doesn’t survive through legitimacy — it survives through narrative control. And if we take that away — not with violence, not with chaos, but with cold, hard, data-driven transparency — we can fundamentally alter how power operates.<p>So this is my invitation. I’m not asking for donations. I’m not launching anything. I just want to see if there are people out there who feel the same urgency. Who understand the technical side of this, and who might want to sketch out what a system like this would look like.<p>Fork this idea. Steal it. Build on it. Improve it. Make it better than I imagined. Or reach out — I’d be glad to work together. I just want it to exist. Because we’re running out of time, and the walls are closing in. And once truth becomes fully permissioned — we’ve lost everything.<p>Let’s make it uncensorable now, before it’s too late.