HackerNews中文版

我们以 Bluesky 为例。当你注册时，你的时间线是空的。但许多人正从 X 这样的平台转向 Bluesky。<p>对于 Bluesky 来说，添加一个“导入你的 X 账户数据”的功能会非常简单，你只需用 X 登录，然后它就会自动读取你所有的个人资料数据（例如，头像、简介、所有帖子等）。用户们将逐步在技术上更先进的平台（例如，联邦或点对点）内“重建” X。这不是一个外部工具，而是一个由 Bluesky 开发、内置和推广的官方导入器。<p>我在很多其他方面也看到了同样的情况，似乎存在一种奇怪的抵制从竞争对手那里导入数据的现象（或者只是没有这样做），尽管这样做会大大提高可用性和向更好平台过渡的便利性。这是为什么呢？

查看原文

Let's consider Bluesky for example. When you sign up there, your timeline is empty. But many people are switching to Bluesky from a platform like X.<p>It would be super simple for Bluesky to add a "Import your X account data", where you log in with X and then it reads out all your profile data (e.g. profile picture, bio, all posts etc.) automatically. Step by step, the users themselves would "reconstruct" X within a technologically more advanced (e.g. federated or peer-to-peer) platform. Not an external tool, but an official importer developed, built-in and promoted by Bluesky.<p>I've seen the same thing in so many other regards, that there seems to be a strange aversion to importing data from competitors (or it's just not been done), even though it would improve usability and ease of transition to something better soooo much. Why is this?

问 HN：为什么很少有工具能从它们的竞争对手那里导入数据？