Ask HN: 像 Astral 这样的公司，在财务上是如何实现盈利的？
2 分•作者: ashwinsundar•7 个月前
首先，请允许我先说，我非常喜欢 uv，并且已经将我所有的 Python 项目都改用它了。它以一种透明且易于使用的方式简化了依赖管理。<p>然而，在阅读了这篇帖子（https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44357411）之后，我开始思考——这个“Astral”公司究竟是何方神圣？<p>https://astral.sh/about<p>我阅读了他们的“关于我们”页面，听起来很棒，我完全支持。但他们毕竟是一家公司，我猜他们总得想办法赚钱。否则他们就没法继续作为一家公司存在了，而我可不希望那样，因为我真的很喜欢 uv。<p>但我也想知道，他们最终是否会从我这个无辜的 uv 用户身上赚钱？过度依赖 uv/Astral 是不是一个错误？或者我能否希望这种关系更像 GitHub 那样（总的来说挺满意的，尽管它变得越来越不好用了……）
查看原文
First of all, let me start by saying that I love uv and have changed all my Python projects to use it. It simplifies dependency management in a transparent and easy-to-use way.<p>However, after reading this thread (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44357411), I began to wonder - who is this company 'Astral' behind all this?<p>https://astral.sh/about<p>I read their about, and it sounds great and I'm all for it. But they are still a company, and I presume they want to make money somehow. Otherwise they'll stop being a company, and I don't want that because I really like uv.<p>But I also want to know if there is some plan to eventually get money out of me, an innocent uv-user. Is it a mistake to become too reliant on uv/Astral? Or can I hope the relationship will be more like GitHub's (pretty happy overall, although it is becoming less usable...)