提问 HN：高中引入 AI。老师和学校需要做出调整吗？
1 分•作者: qrsbrrr•9 个月前
学校的主要任务是教你学习。如果你不是正态分布曲线左侧的特例，它通常是有效的。
我目前正在重新学习预备微积分。实际上，这更像是学习，因为我的德国文理中学减缓了学习速度，并且降低了我们一半年级的要求，因为 *我们就不深入讨论了*。
大多数行业，除了科学和手工业，都在变得越来越简单，所以理论上，孩子们甚至可以比过去二十年更笨地进入劳动力市场。在过去的二十年里，人们对低质量、低积极性（学士）大学毕业生的抱怨，掩盖了劳动力入职中的许多其他系统性问题。
政府、教师、各部委的负责人是否应该提高优先事项，以补偿由于人工智能使用而导致的认知能力负面影响，或者年轻人通过人工智能的使用而逐步提高就足够了？
如果是，该如何做？哪些学科可以相应地调整课程？据我所知，至少有一些讨论认为学校课程根本没有跟上时代。无论是文化方面，还是从这种文化和亚文化中产生的心理社会领域，都是如此。
如果有人能提供相关的引用，我将不胜感激。
查看原文
School's main task is to teach you learning. If you are not an exception somewhere left of the bell curve, it'll work.<p>I'm relearning precalculus at the moment. It's learning, really, since my German Gymnasium slowed down the learning speed and reduced requirements for/due half our Jahrgang because <i>let's not get into that</i>.<p>Things in most industries beyond science and the crafts are turning into child's play, so, theoretically, kids can enter the work force even dumber than in the last two decades, in which a lot of complaining about low-quality, low-motivation (Bachelor) university graduates overshadowed a lot of other systemic issues in workforce onboarding.<p>Should governments, teachers, heads of ministries up the priority of compensating the negative offsets in cognitive abilities due to the use of AI or will the progressive improvement of youngsters in/with/due AI use be enough?<p>If yes, how? How and which subjects could adapt the curricula appropriately and accordingly? As far as I remember, there was at least some discussion that school curricula were not up to date at all. Neither with culture, nor with the psycho-social spectrum emerging from that culture and sub-cultures.<p>If someone can provide relevant citations, I would be grateful.